|
![]() |
||
Fig. 2 instantaneous u-velocity | Fig. 3 phase averaged streamline |
Fig. 3 displays the strong influence of the model used in the RANS calculation. The EASM reveals the same topological features as the LES, but differs in the extent of the recirculation zones. The Wilcox model predicts, however, a considerably different flow field: the recirculation zone becomes larger and the wake is much more stretched. This can also be concluded from table 1, where the global parameters are listed. The Wilcox model cannot capture the transient dynamics of the flow, as both rms values are nearly zero. The EASM predicts fluctuations in the range of the LES and almost the same drag coefficient. However, slight differences appear in the predicted Strouhal number.
![]() |
1 2 3 4 |
![]() |